Inseguridad alimentaria, bienestar subjetivo y uso de redes sociales en Brasil entre 2014 y 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0265Palabras clave:
Inseguridad alimentaria, Bienestar subjetivo, Redes sociales, Felicidad, Satisfacción con la vidaResumen
La gran recesión brasileña fue la más marcada caída de la actividad económica en Brasil entre el final de la Segunda Guerra Mundial y la pandemia de COVID-19. Esta crisis económica puede tener consecuencias negativas a largo plazo e imprevistas sobre la inseguridad alimentaria (IA) y el bienestar subjetivo (BES). Además, BES está cada vez más ligado a la popularización de las redes sociales. Con datos de la World Value Survey (WVS) y modelos logísticos y logísticos ordenados se usaron en este artículo para corroborar empíricamente algunas hipótesis. Los resultados mostraron que la IA estaba más asociada a la satisfacción con la vida que a la felicidad, y se correlacionaba de manera negativa con la satisfacción con la vida, pero no con la felicidad. A su vez, la IA no se relacionaba con el uso de redes sociales, ya que la población que sufre de IA se superponen poco con quienes las usan. Por su parte, el BES mostró relaciones positivas con el uso de las redes sociales cuando su uso aún no estaba generalizado, pero las asociaciones entre el BES y el uso de las redes sociales se volvieron negativas a medida que su uso se generalizó.
Descargas
Citas
BAI, J.; MO, K.; PENG, Y.; HAO, W.; QU, Y.; LEI, X.; YANG, Y. The relationship between the use of Mobile social media and subjective well-being: the mediating effect of boredom proneness. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, article 568492, 2021.
BLANCHFLOWER, D.; OSWALD, A. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, v. 88, n. 7-8, p. 1359-1386, 2004.
BRAGA, C.; COSTA, L. Time use and food insecurity in female-headed households in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 39, e0200, 2022.
CORBI, R.; MENEZES-FILHO, N. Os determinantes empíricos da felicidade no Brasil. Revista de Economia Política, v. 26, p. 518-536, 2006.
CORSEUIL, C.; FRANCA, M. Inserção dos jovens no mercado de trabalho brasileiro: evolução e desigualdades no período 2006-2013. Brasília: International Labor Organization, 2016.
DIENER, E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, v. 95, n. 3, p. 542-575, 1984.
DOLAN, P.; PEASGOOD, T.; WHITE, M. Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 29, p. 94-122, 2008.
ELGAR, F.; PICKETT, W.; PFORTNER, T.; GARIEPY, G.; GORDON, D.; GEORGIADESF, K.; DAVISON, C.; HAMMAMI, N.; MACNEIL, A.; SILVA, M.; MELGAR-QUINONEZ, H. Relative food insecurity, mental health and wellbeing in 160 countries. Social Science & Medicine, v. 268, article 13556, 2021.
FAO-UN. The state of food security and nutrition in the world: safeguarding against economic slowdowns and downturns. Rome: FAO, 2019.
FELKER-KANTOR, E.; WOOD, C. Female-headed households and food insecurity in Brazil. Food Security, v. 4, p. 607-617, 2012.
FIRPO, S.; PIERI, R. The labor market in Brazil, 2001-2015. IZA World of Labor, n. 10, 2018.
FRONGILLO, E.; NGUYEN, H.; SMITH, M.; COLEMAN-JENSEN, A. Food insecurity is associated with subjective well-being among individuals from 138 countries in the 2014 Gallup world poll. The Journal of Nutrition, v. 4, p. 680-687, 2017.
GOLGHER, A. Recent evolution of minorities attendance and profile at UFMG. Cadernos de Pesquisa, v. 51, e07351, 2021.
GOLGHER, A.; COUTINHO, R. The most wretched and the most blissful individuals in Brazil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, v. 58, p. 299-325, 2021.
GORI-MAIA, A. Relative income, inequality and subjective wellbeing: evidence for Brazil. Social Indicators Research, v. 113, n. 3, p. 1193-1204, 2013.
HALLER, M.; HADLER, M. How social relations and structures can produce happiness and unhappiness: an international comparative analysis. Social Indicators Research, v. 75, p, 169-216, 2006.
HELLIWELL, J. Well-being, social capital and public policy: what’s new? Economic Journal, v. 116, p. C34-C45, 2006.
KORNHER, L.; SAKKETA, T. Does food security matter to subjective well-being? Evidence from a cross-country panel. Journal of International Development, v. 33, p. 1270-1289, 2021.
LIN, S.; LIU, D.; LIU, W.; HUI, Q.; CORTINA, K. S.; YOU, X. Mediating effects of self-concept clarity on the relationship between passive social network sites use and subjective well-being. Current Psychology, v. 40, p. 1348-1355, 2021.
MACHADO, A.; GOLGHER, A.; ANTIGO, M. Deprivation viewed from a multidimensional perspective: the case of Brazil. Cepal Review, v. 112, 2014.
MAIA, A.; MENEZES, E. Economic growth, labor and productivity in Brazil and the United States: a comparative analysis. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, v. 34, p. 212-229, 2014.
MEDVEDEV, O.; LANDHUIS, C. Exploring constructs of well-being, happiness and quality of life. PeerJ, v. 6, e4903, 2018.
MONTÁLVÃO, A.; RIBEIRO, C. Youth labor market prospects in times of economic recession in Brazil. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 688, n. 1, p. 38-54, 2020.
NEMATI, S.; MARALANI, F. The relationship between life satisfaction and happiness: the mediating role of resiliency. International Journal of Psychological Studies, v. 8, p. 194-201, 2016.
NERI, M. Insegurança alimentar no Brasil: pandemia, tendências e comparações internacionais. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Social, 2022.
NG, Y. Happiness, life satisfaction, or subjective well-being? A measurement and moral philosophical perspective. Available at: https://www.ntu.edu.sg/home/ykng/Happiness,LS,%20SWB-2015.pdf Access on: 20 Jul. 2023.
OREIRO, J. A grande recessão brasileira: diagnóstico e uma agenda de política econômica. Estudos Avançados, v. 31, p. 75-88, 2017.
OZIMEK, P.; BIERHOFF, H.-W. All my online-friends are better than me - three studies about ability-based comparative social media use, self-esteem, and depressive tendencies. Behaviour & Information Technology, v. 39, p. 1110-1123, 2020.
PANG, H. How does time spent on WeChat bolster subjective well-being through social integration and social capital? Telematics and Informatics, v. 35, p, 2147-2156, 2018.
PENSSAN. II Inquérito Nacional sobre Insegurança Alimentar no Contexto da Pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil: II VIGISAN. São Paulo: Fundação Friedrich Ebert; 2022.
RIBEIRO, C. Renda, relações sociais e felicidade no Brasil. Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 58, p. 37-78, 2015.
RUEL, M.; GARRETT, J.; HAWKES, C.; COHEN, M. The food, fuel, and financial crises affect the urban and rural poor disproportionately: a review of the evidence. The Journal of Nutrition, v. 140, p. 170S-176S, 2010.
SAAD-FILHO, A. Mass protests under ‘left neoliberalism’: Brazil, June-July 2013. Critical Sociology, v. 39, p. 657-669, 2013.
SALAHODJAEV, R.; MIRZIYOYEVA, Z. The link between food security and life satisfaction: panel data analysis. Sustainability, v. 13, n. 2918, 2021.
SMITH, M.; WESSELBAUM, D. Food insecurity predicts well-being inequality. Preventive Medicine, v. 167, n. 107407, 2023.
SOUZA, L.; SEGALL-CORRÊA, A.; VILLE, A.; MELGAR-QUIÑONEZ, H. Food security status in times of financial and political crisis in Brazil. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 35, e00084118, 2019.
WU, B.; LIU, T.; TIAN, B. How does social media use impact subjective well-being? Examining the suppressing role of Internet addiction and the moderating effect of digital skills. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 14, article 1108692, 2023.
YANG, H. Do SNSs really make us happy? The effects of writing and reading via SNSs on subjective well-being. Telematics and Informatics, v. 50, article 101384, 2020.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los artículos publicados en Rebep son originales y están protegidos bajo la licencia de tipo atribución Creative Commons (CC-BY). Esta licencia le permite reutilizar las publicaciones en su totalidad o en parte para cualquier propósito, de forma gratuita, incluso con fines comerciales. Cualquier persona o institución puede copiar, distribuir o reutilizar el contenido, siempre que se mencione debidamente el autor y la fuente original.
