Intenciones de fecundidad: una revisión de la literatura sobre la variable en países de ingresos altos y en Brasil

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0238

Palabras clave:

Intenciones, Fecundidad, Revisión de literatura

Resumen

La literatura sobre las intenciones de fecundidad ha ganado relevancia en los estudios demográficos porque, al ser estas determinantes próximos de la fecundidad, ayudan a entender el comportamiento reproductivo de diferentes poblaciones. Sin embargo, esta literatura no se ha organizado según sus aspectos principales y más recurrentes. Así, los estudios trabaja en general sobre un solo aspecto de las intenciones de fecundidad, sea a través de sus conceptos, de sus principales teorías o de sus principales indicadores. El objetivo de este artículo es, por lo tanto, organizar y articular los principales y más recurrentes aspectos presentes en los estudios sobre intenciones reproductivas. Así, comienza presentando sus conceptos principales. Luego, discute importantes corrientes teóricas sobre la formación de intenciones de fecundidad y analiza sus principales determinantes. Finalmente, contextualiza las intenciones de fecundidad (y sus niveles) en diferentes escenarios. A través de cada tema presentado, se profundiza en la relación entre las intenciones de fecundidad y la fecundidad observada en las poblaciones. Es para ello que se centra, en un primer momento, en los países de ingresos altos, sobre y para los cuales se elaboró la literatura sobre el tema. También se analizan los países de ingresos medios y de baja fecundidad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Victor Leocádio, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte-MG, Brasil

Victor Leocádio é doutor pelo Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional (Cedeplar) e mestre em Demografia pelo Cedeplar. Pesquisador visitante pelo Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI). Especialista em políticas públicas e gestão governamental (governo de Minas Gerais).

Ana Paula Verona, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte-MG, Brasil

Ana Paula Verona é doutora em Demografia pela University of Texas at Austin. Professora associada I do Departamento de Demografia, Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional (Cedeplar) da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG).

Simone Wajnman, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte-MG, Brasil

Simone Wajnman é doutora em Demografia pelo Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional (Cedeplar), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Pesquisadora do Cedeplar/UFMG.

Citas

AJZEN, I.; KLOBAS, J. Fertility intentions: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, v. 29, n. 8, p. 203-232, 2013.

AJZEN, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, p. 179-211, 1991.

ALONSO, F. G. The uneven distribution of family responsibilities between women and men, and its link with low fertility: some evidence for European Union countries from Eurobarometer data. Centre d’Estudis Demogràfics, 2004. (Papers de Demografia, n. 253).

ARILHA, M.; BERQUÓ, E. Cairo +15: trajetórias globais e caminhos brasileiros em saúde reprodutiva e direitos reprodutivos. In: ARILHA, M.; BERQUÓ, E. Brasil, 15 anos após a Conferência do Cairo. Campinas, SP: Fundo de População das Nações Unidas, 2009.

BACHRACH, C. A.; MORGAN, S. P. A cognitive-social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 459-485, 2013.

BALBO, N.; MILLS, M. The influence of the family network on the realization of fertility intentions. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 179-206, 2011.

BASTEN, S.; SOBOTKA; T.; ZEMAN, K. Future fertility in low fertility countries. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography (VID), Austrian Academy of Sciences, 2013. (Working Paper, n. 5/2013).

BALBO, N.; BILLARI, F. C.; MILLS, M. Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research. European Journal of Population, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1-38, 2012.

BECKER, G. S. An economic analysis of fertility. In: COALE, A. J.; GILLE, H.; JOHNSON, G. C.; KISER, C. V. (Ed.). Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960. p. 209-240.

BECKER, G. S. A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. Journal of Political Economy, v. 99, p. 1109-1116, 1991.

BECKER, G. S. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.

BILLARI, F. C.; LIEFBROER, A. C.; PHILIPOV, D. The postponement of childbearing in Europe: driving forces and implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 4, n. 1, 2006.

BILLARI, F. C.; PHILIPOV, D.; TESTA, M. R. Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, v. 25, n. 4, p. 439-465, 2009.

BLOOM, D. E.; CANNING, D.; GÜNTER, I.; LINNEMAYR, S. Social interactions and fertility in developing countries. Harvard School of Public Health, 2008. (Working Paper, n. 34).

BLOSSFELD, H.-P.; KLIJZING, E.; MILLS, M.; KURZ, K. Globalisation, uncertainty, and youth in society. London: Routledge, 2005.

BONGAARTS, J. Do reproductive intentions matter? International Family Planning Perspectives, v. 18, n. 3, p. 102-108, 1992.

BONGAARTS, J. Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, v. 27, p. 260-281, 2001.

BONGAARTS, J. The measurement of wanted fertility. Population and Development Review, v. 16, n. 3, p. 487- 506, 1990.

BRADLEY, S.; CASTERLINE, J. B. Understanding unmet need: history, theory, measurement. Studies in Family Planning, v. 45, n. 2, p. 123-150, 2014.

BRINTON, M.; LEE, D. J. Gender-role ideology, labor market institutions, and post-industrial fertility. Population and Development Review, v. 42, n. 3, p. 405-433, 2016.

BÜHLER, C.; FRATCZAK, E. Learning from others and receiving support: the impact of personal networks on fertility intentions in Poland. European Societies, v. 9, n. 3, p. 359-382, 2007.

CARVALHO, A. A. Demand for contraception in Brazil in 2006: contribution to the implementation of fertility preferences. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 24, n. 10, p. 3879-3888, 2019.

CARVALHO, A. A.; MIRANDA-RIBEIRO, P. As preferências de fecundidade e o planejamento por filhos: discussões a partir de relatos de homens unidos de uma capital e de uma região de fronteira no Brasil. In: SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL FAZENDO GÊNERO, 11 & WOMEN’S WORLDS CONGRESS, 13. Anais [...]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2017.

CARVALHO, A. A.; WONG, L. L. R.; MIRANDA-RIBEIRO, P. Discrepant fertility in Brazil: an analysis of women who have fewer children than desired (1996 and 2006). Revista Latinoamericana de Población, v. 8, p. 83-106, 2016.

CARVALHO, J. A. M.; GARCIA, R. A. O envelhecimento da população brasileira: um enfoque demográfico. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 19, n. 3, p. 725-733, 2003.

CASTERLINE, J. B.; SINDING, S. Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy. Population and Development Review, v. 26, n. 4, p. 691-723, 2000.

CAVENAGHI, S.; ALVES, J. Diversity of childbearing behaviour in the context of below-replacement fertility in Brazil. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2011. (Population Division, Expert Paper, n. 8).

CEPAL - Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe. Panorama actual y perspectivas futuras de la fecundidad en América Latina. Panorama social de América Latina 2011. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas, 2012. p. 81-105. Disponível em: http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/1/45171/PSE2011-Panorama-Socialde-America-Latina.pdf Acesso em: ago. 2021.

CHACKIEL, J.; SCHKOLNIK, S. América Latina: los sectores rezagados en la transición de la fecundidad. In: CELADE/CEPAL (Org.). La fecundidad en América Latina: ¿Transición o revolución? Santiago de Chile: Celade/Cepal, 2003. p. 51-74.

CHESNAIS, J. C. Determinants of below replacement fertility. Population Bulletin of the United Nations, v. 40, p. 126-136, 2000.

CHESNAIS, J. C. Fertility, family and social policy. Population and Development Review, v. 22, p. 729-739, 1996.

CIRITEL, A. A.; DE ROSE, A.; AREZZO, M. F. Childbearing intentions in a low fertility context: the case of Romania. Genus, v. 75, n. 4, 2019.

COALE, A. J. The demographic transition reconsidered. In: INTERNATIONAL POPULATION CONFERENCE. Proceedings […]. Liège, Belgium: Eds. Ordina, 1973.

COUTINHO, R.; GOLGHER, A. Modelling the proximate determinants of fertility for Brazil: the advent of competing preferences. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 35, n. 1, 2018.

DAVIDSON, A. R.; JACCARD, J. J. Variables that moderate the attitude-behavior relation: results of a longitudinal survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 37, p. 1364-1376, 1979.

ENGELHARDT, H. Fertility intentions and Preferences: effects of structural and financial incentives and constraints in Austria. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, 2004. (Working Paper, 02/2004).

ESHRE CAPRI WORKSHOP GROUP. Europe the continent with the lowest fertility. Human Reproduction Update, v. 16, n. 6, p. 590-602, 2010.

ESPING-ANDERSEN, G.; BILLARI, F. Re-theorizing family demographic change. Population and Development Review, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2015.

FIORI, F. Do childcare arrangements make the difference? A multilevel approach to the intention of having a second child in Italy. Population Space and Place, v. 17, n. 5, p. 579-596, 2011.

FIORI, F.; RINESI, F.; PINNELLI, A.; PRATI, S. Economic insecurity and the fertility intentions of Italian women with one child. Population Research and Policy Review, v. 32, n. 3, p. 373-413, 2013.

FOX, J.; KLÜSENER, S.; MYRSKYLÄ, M. Is a positive relationship between fertility and economic development emerging at the sub-national regional level? Theoretical considerations and evidence from Europe. European Journal of Population, v. 35, p. 487-518, 2019.

FREJKA, T.; GOLDSCHEIDER, F.; LAPPEGÅRD, T. The two-part gender revolution, women’s second shift and changing cohort fertility. Comparative Population Studies, v. 43, p. 99-130, 2018.

GALLUP, G.; ROBINSON, C. American Institute of Public Opinion surveys, 1935- 1938. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 2, n. 3, p. 373-398, 1938.

GAUTHIER, A.; CABAÇO, S.; EMERY, T. Generations and gender survey study profile. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, v. 9, n. 4, p. 456-465, 2018.

GOLDSCHEIDER, F.; BERNHARDT, E.; LAPPEGÅRD, T. The gender revolution: a framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, v. 41 n. 2, p. 207-239, 2015.

GOLDSTEIN, J. R.; LUTZ, W.; TESTA, M. R. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review, v. 2, n. 2, p. 479-496, 2003.

GONZÁLEZ, M. A Discrepância entre a fecundidade desejada e a fecundidade concretizada enquanto uma questão de gênero. 2015. 114f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Demografia) - Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 2015.

GUZMAN, J. M. Fertility transition in Latin America. IPPF Medical Bulletin, v. 23, n. 5, p. 1-3, 1989.

HAGEWEN, K. J.; MORGAN, S. P. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002. Population and Development Review, v. 31, p. 507-527, 2005.

HAKKERT, R. Fecundidad deseada y no deseada en América Latina, con particular referencia a algunos aspectos de género. In: CELADE/CEPAL (Org.). La fecundidad en América Latina: ¿Transición o revolución? Santiago de Chile: Celade/Cepal, 2003. p. 267-288.

HAMADEH, N.; VAN ROMPAEY, C.; METREAU, E.; EAPEN, S. G. New World Bank country classifications by income level: 2022-2023. World Bank Blogs, 2022. Disponível em: https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2022-2023#:~:text=Region,-Include%20Values&text=The%20World%20Bank%20assigns%20the,the%20previous%20year%20(2021) Acesso em: dez. 2022.

HARKNETT, K.; HARTNETT, C. The gap between births intended and births achieved in 22 European countries. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, v. 68, p. 265-282, 2014.

HAYFORD, S.; AGADJANIAN, V. Uncertain future, non-numeric preferences, and the fertility transition: A case study of rural Mozambique. Etude de la Population Africaine, v. 25, n. 2, p. 419-439, 2011.

HAYFORD, S. The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography, v. 46, n.4, p. 765-783, 2009.

HEILAND, F.; PRSKAWETZ, A.; SANDERSON, W. Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from west German panel data. European Journal of Population, v. 24, n. 2, p. 129-156, 2008.

HENSVIK, L.; NILSSON, P. Business, buddies and babies: social ties and fertility at work. Uppsala: IFAU, 2010. (Working Paper 2010:9).

HERMALIN, A. I.; FREEDMAN, R.; SUN, T.; CHANG, M. Do intentions predict fertility? The experience in Taiwan, 1967-1974. Studies in Family Planning, v.10, p. 75-95, 1979.

HIN, S.; GAUTHIER, A.; GOLDSTEIN, J.; BÜHLER, C. Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 131-156, 2011.

IACOVOU, M.; TAVARES, L. P. Yearning, learning, and conceding: reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 89-123, 2011.

ICF. Demographic and health survey interviewer’s manual. Rockville, Maryland, 2019.

JOHNSON-HANKS, J. A.; BACHRACH, C. A.; MORGAN, S. P.; KOHLER, H-P. Understanding family change and variation: toward a theory of conjunctural action. Dordrecht, The NetherlandsSpringer, 2011.

JUÁREZ, F.; GAYET, C. Fertility transition: Latin America and the Caribbean. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015. p. 68-72.

JUAREZ, F.; SINGH, S.; MADDOW-ZIMET, I.;WULF, D. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Mexico: causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/Unintended-Pregnancy-Mexico.pdf Acesso em: ago. 2021.

KAPITÀNY, B.; SPÉDER, Z. Realization, postponement or abandonment of childbearing intentions in four European countries. Population, v .67, p. 599-630, 2012.

KLERMAN, L. V. The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition. Maternal and Child Health Journal, v. 4, n. 3, p. 155-162, 2000.

KLOBAS, J. The theory of planned behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 47-54, 2011.

KODZI, I. A.; JOHNSON, D. R.; CASTERLINE, J. B. To have or not to have another child: life cycle, health and cost considerations of Ghanaian women. Social Science & Medicine, v. 74, n. 7, p. 966-72, 2012.

KUHNT, A. K.; TRAPPE, H. Easier said than done: childbearing intentions and their realization in a short-term perspective. Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2013. (Working Paper, 2013/018).

LEE, J. N.; HWANG, M. J. Determinants on the number of children among married women in Korea. Journal of Population and Social Studies, v. 27, n. 1, p. 53-69, 2019.

LEE, R. Becker and the demographic transition. Journal of Demographic Economics, v. 81, n. 1, p. 67-74, 2015.

LIEFBROER, A. C. Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: a life course perspective. European Journal of Population, v. 25, n. 4, p. 363-386, 2009.

LIEFBROER, A. C. The impact of perceived costs and rewards of childbearing on entry into parenthood: evidence from a panel study. European Journal of Population, v. 21, n.4, p. 367-391, 2005.

LUTZ, W. Adaptation versus mitigation policies on demographic change in Europe. Vienna Yearbook for Population Research, v. 5, p. 19-26, 2007.

LUTZ, W.; SKIRBEKK, V.; TESTA, M. R. The low-fertility trap hypothesis: forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 4, p. 167-192, 2006.

MATSUO, H.; MATTHIJS, K. The impact of well-being on fertility intentions - an analysis based on the European Social Survey (2010). Research & Methods, v. 25, p. 17-46, 2016.

MCDONALD, P. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, v. 6, n. 3, p. 427-439, 2000.

MENCARINI, L.; VIGNOLI, D.; GOTTARD, A. Fertility intentions and outcomes: implementing the theory of planned behavior with graphical models. Advances in Life Course Research. v. 23, p. 14-28, 2015.

MENCARINI, L.; TANTURRI, M. L. Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women. Genus, v. 60, p. 111-137, 2004.

MILLER, W. B. Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: a theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychological Monographs, v.120, n. 2, p. 223-258, 1994.

MILLER, W. B. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 75-98, 2011.

MILLER, W. B.; PASTA, D. J. Behavioral intentions: which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, v. 25, p. 530-555, 1995.

MILLER, W. B.; SEVERY, L. J.; PASTA, D. J. A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies, v. 58, n. 2, p. 193-205, 2004.

MIRANDA-RIBEIRO, A.; GARCIA, R. Transições da fecundidade no Brasil: uma análise à luz dos diferenciais por escolaridade. In: XVIII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ESTUDOS POPULACIONAIS. Anais [...]. Águas de Lindóia-SP: Abep, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.abep.nepo.unicamp.br/ xviii/anais/files/400.pdf

MORGAN, S. P. Should fertility intentions inform fertility forecasts? In: US CENSUS BUREAU CONFERENCE: THE DIRECTION OF FERTILITY IN THE UNITED STATES. Proceedings […]. Washington, DC: 7 US Census Bureau, 2001. p. 153-178.

MORGAN, S. P.; RACKIN, H. The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, v. 36, n. 1, p. 91-118, 2010.

MORGAN, S. P.; TAYLOR, M. G. Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 32, p. 375-99, 2006.

MYRSKYLÄ, M.; KOHLER, H. P.; BILLARI, F. C. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, v. 460, p. 741-743, 2009.

NÍ BHROLCHÁIN, M.; BEAUJOUAN, E. How real are reproductive goals? Uncertainty and the construction of fertility preferences. ESRC Centre for Population Change, Dec. 2015. (Working Paper, 73).

OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Family Database, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm Acesso em: jul. 2021.

PERI, A.; PARDO, I. Nueva evidencia sobre la hipótesis de la doble insatisfacción en Uruguay: ¿Cuán lejos estamos de que toda la fecundidad sea deseada? In: WONG, L. R. (Org.). Población y salud sexual y reproductiva en América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Alap, 2008. p. 55-88 (Serie Investigaciones, n. 4).

PHILIPOV, D.; BERNARDI, L. Reproductive decisions: concepts and measurement in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Comparative Population Studies, v. 36, n. 2-3, p. 495-530, 2011.

PHILIPOV, D. Fertility intentions and outcomes: the role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population, v. 25, n. 4, p. 355-361, 2009.

PHILIPOV, D. Fertility in times of discontinuous societal change: the case of Central and Eastern Europe. Rostock: MPIDR - Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2002. (Working Paper, 2002-24).

PHILIPOV, D.; THÉVENON, O.; KLOBAS, J.; BERNARDI, L.; LIEFBROER, A. C. Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO): a state of the art review. European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme under the Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities Theme, 2009. (Working Paper).

PHILIPOV, D.; SPÉDER, Z.; BILLARI, F. C. Soon, later, or ever? The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001). Population Studies, v. 60, n. 3, p. 289-308, 2006.

QUESNEL-VALLEE, A.; MORGAN, P. Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review, v. 22, p. 497- 525, 2003.

RAYBOULD, A.; SEAR, R. Children of the (gender) revolution: a theoretical and empirical synthesis of how gendered division of labour influences fertility. Population Studies, v. 75, n. 2, p. 169-190, 2020.

RÉGNIER-LOILIER, A. Influence of own sib ship size on the number of children desired at various times of life: the case of France. Population (english edition), v. 61, n. 3, p. 165-194, 2006.

REGNIER-LOILIER, A.; VIGNOLI, D. Fertility intentions and obstacles to their realization in France and Italy. Population-E, v. 66, n. 2, p. 361-390, 2011.

REHER, D. S. Economic and social implications of the demographic transition. Population and Development Review, v. 37, p. 11-3, 2011.

RINESI, F. Fecondità attesa e realizzata delle madri italiane. 93f. thesis (PhD) - La Sapienza, University of Rome, 2009.

ROSERO-BIXBY, L.; CASTRO-MARTÍN, T.; MARTÍN-GARCÍA, T. Is Latin America starting to retreat from early and universal childbearing? Demographic Research, v. 20, n. 9, p. 169-194, 2009.

ROSSIER, C.; BERNARDI, L. Social interaction effects on fertility: intentions and behaviors. European Journal of Population, v. 25, n. 4, p. 467-485, 2009.

SANTELLI, J.; ROCHAT, R.; HATFIELD-TIMAJCHY, K.; GILBERT, B. C.; CURTIS, K.; CABRAL, R.; HIRSCH, J. S.; SCHIEVE, L. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, v. 35, n. 2, p. 94-101, 2003.

SCHOEN, R.; ASTONE, N.; M.; KIM, Y. J., NATHANSON, C. A. Do fertility intentions affect fertility behaviours? Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 61, n. 3, p. 790-799, 1999.

SIMÃO, A. B.; COUTINHO, R. Z.; GUEDES, G. R. Desejo por filhos entre mulheres de alta escolaridade: conflitos, mudanças e permanências. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 37, p. 1-23, 2020.

SOBOTKA, T.; BEAUJOUAN, E. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Vienna Institute of Demography, 2014. (Working Papers, 3).

SOBOTKA, T.; BILLARI, F. C.; KOHLER, H.-P. The return of late childbearing in developed countries: causes, trends and implications. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, 2010.

SOBOTKA, T. Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO). Synthesis and policy implications. European Demographic Research Papers 1. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 2011.

SOBOTKA, T. Sub-replacement fertility intentions in Austria. European Journal of Population, v. 25 n. 4, p. 387-412, 2009.

TANSKANEN, A. O.; ROTKIRCH, A. The impact of grandparental investment on mothers’ fertility intentions in four European countries. Demographic Research, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2014.

TAZI-PREVE, I. M.; BICHLBAUER, D.; GOUJON, A. Gender trouble and its impact on fertility intentions. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, v. 40, p. 5-24, 2004.

TESTA, M. R. Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 Survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 5, p. 357-379, 2007.

TESTA, M. R. Couple disagreement about short-term fertility desires in Austria: effects on intentions and contraceptive behaviour. Demographic Research, v. 26, n. 3, p. 63-98, 2012a.

TESTA, M. R. Family sizes in Europe: evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer Survey Contents. Vienna : Vienna Institute of Demography, 2012b. (Working Paper, 2012-2).

TESTA, M. R. On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individual-and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research, v. 21, p. 28-42, 2014.

TESTA M. R.; GRILLI, L. The influence of childbearing regional contexts on ideal family size in Europe. Population (English edition), v. 61, p. 109-138, 2006.

THÉVENON, O.; LUCI-GREULICH, A. The impact of family policy packages on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population, v. 29, n. 4, p. 387-416, 2013.

THOMSON, E. Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, v. 34, n. 3 p. 343-54, 1997.

UDRY, J. R. Do couples make fertility plans one birth at a time? Demography, v. 20, n. 2, p. 117-128, 1983.

UNDESA - United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World economic and social survey 2008. Overcoming economic insecurity. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/policy/wess-2008.shtml Acesso em: 2021.

UNFPA - Fundo de População das Nações Unidas. Fecundidade e dinâmica da população brasileira. Brasília: UNFPA, 2018. Disponível em: unfpa.org.br. Acesso em: ago. 2021.

UNITED NATIONS. Data Portal. Populations Division, 2022. Disponível em: https://population.un.org/dataportal/. Acesso em: ago. 2021.

VAN DE WALLE, E. Fertility transition, conscious choice, and numeracy. Demography, v. 29, n. 4, p. 487-502, 1992.

VAN PEER, C. Desired and achieved fertility. In: KLIJZING, E.; CORIJN, M. (Ed.). Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe: insights and lessons from comparative research. New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2002. v. 2, p. 117-141.

VIGNOLI, J. R. Fecundidad no deseada entre las adolescentes latinoamericanas. Un aumento que desafía la salud sexual y reproductiva y el ejercicio de derechos. Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía (CELADE), División de Población de la Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, 2017. (Série Populación y Desarrollo).

WESTOFF, C. F.; RYDER, N. B. The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography, v. 14, n. 4, p. 431-53, 1977.

WONG, L. L. R. Evidences of further decline of fertility in Latina America: reproductive behavior and some thoughts on the consequences on the age structure. In: CAVENAGHI, S. M. (Org.). Demographic transformations and inequalities in Latin America: historical trends and recent patterns. Rio de Janeiro: Alap, 2009. (Serie Investigaciones, n. 8).

YU, W.; KUO, J. C. L. Another work-family interface: work characteristics and family intentions in Japan. Demographic Research, v. 36, p. 391-426, 2017.

Publicado

2023-04-07

Cómo citar

Leocádio, V., Verona, A. P., & Wajnman, S. (2023). Intenciones de fecundidad: una revisión de la literatura sobre la variable en países de ingresos altos y en Brasil. Revista Brasileira De Estudos De População, 40, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0238

Número

Sección

Artigos de revisão