Associação entre Equidade de Gênero na Família e Intenções de Fecundidade: Uma Análise do Contexto Brasileiro com Machine Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0299Keywords:
Intentions, Fertility, Gender, Equity, Family, Brazil, Machine LearningAbstract
The literature on gender equity and fertility proposes a U-shaped curve to explain the relationship between these variables. As women gain greater equity in the public sphere (e.g., through education and employment), their opportunity costs increase. Combined with their nearly full responsibility for unpaid domestic work, this results in reduced reproductive intentions and, consequently, lower fertility. Reversing this downward trend would require greater equity in the private sphere, with increased male participation in domestic tasks. Several studies have examined the positive association between gender equity in the family and fertility or fertility intentions in high-income, low-fertility countries—the primary context for this model. However, few studies explore this relationship in lower-income, low-fertility countries like Brazil. This study is pioneering in investigating this association within Brazil. Given the lack of a nationally representative data source that includes both variables of gender equity in the family and fertility intentions, our analytical approach combines data from the 2006 PNDS and the 2006 and 2015 PNADs, applying machine learning methods to calculate the predicted probability of intending to have a second child. Using this proxy variable, we adjusted a series of models, and, overall, the results indicate a negative relationship, contrary to the theoretical framework. This outcome may stem from how variables were operationalized. Alternatively, Brazil’s lag in the first phase of the Gender Revolution—advancing public sphere gender equity—might also explain the negative association observed in this context.
Downloads
References
ARPINO, B.; ESPING-ANDERSEN, G.; PESSIN, L. How do changes in gender role attitudes towards female employment influence fertility? A macro-level analysis. European Sociological Review, v. 31, n. 3, p. 370-382, 2015.
ATAKE, E.; ALI, P. G. Women’s empowerment and fertility preferences in high fertility countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Women’s Health, v. 19, n. 1, p. 1-54, 2019.
BARBOSA, A. L. N. H. Tendências nas horas dedicadas ao trabalho e lazer: uma análise da alocação do tempo no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (Ipea), 2018. (Texto para Discussão, n. 2416).
BECKER, G. S. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saúde da Criança e da Mulher - PNDS 2006: dimensões do processo reprodutivo e da saúde da criança. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2009. (Série G. Estatística e Informação em Saúde).
BRUCE, P.; ANDREW, B. Practical statistics for data scientists. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2017.
COUTINHO, R.; GOLGHER, A. Modelling the proximate determinants of fertility for Brazil: the advent of competing preferences. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 35, n. 1, 2018.
DOMMERMUTH, L.; HOHMANN-MARRIOTT, B.; LAPPEGÅRD, T. Gender equality in the family and childbearing. Journal of Family Issues, v. 38, n. 13, p. 1803-1824, 2017.
DUVANDER, A. Z.; LAPPEGÅRD, T.; ANDERSEN, S. N. Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Demographic Research, v. 40, p. 1501-1528, 2019.
ERFANI, A.; PILON, L. Gender equality in the division of housework and fertility intentions in Canada: the moderating effect of employment and education. Journal of Family Issues, v. 0, n. 0, 2024.
ESCOVEDO, T.; KOSHIYAMA, A. Introdução a data science - algoritmos de machine learning e métodos de análise. São Paulo: Ed. Casa do Código, 2020.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, G.; BILLARI, F. Re-theorizing family demographic change. Population and Development Review, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2015.
GREENSTEIN, T. N. Economic dependence, gender, and the division of labor in the home: a replication and extension. Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 62, p. 322-225, 2000.
GOLDSCHEIDER, F.; BERNHARDT, E.; LAPPEGÅRD, T. The gender revolution: a framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, v. 41, n. 2, p. 207-239, 2015.
HAN, S. W.; GOWEN, O.; BRINTON, M. C. When mothers do it all: gender-role norms, women’s employment, and fertility intentions in post-industrial societies. European Sociological Review, v. 40, n. 2, p. 309-325, 2024.
HONG, S. H. The effects of female labor force participation, family policies, and gender equality on fertility rate: Focused on OECD countries. Korean Family Resource Management Association, v. 25, n. 2, p. 41-52, 2021.
IBGE - Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios. Disponível em: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/educacao/9127-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de%20domicilios.html?=&t=o-que-e Acesso em: 17 abr. 2024.
JAMES, G.; WITEN, D.; HASTIE, T.; TIBSHIRANI, R. An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. Berlin: Springer, 2014.
KOLPASHNIKOVA, K.; KAN, M. Y. Housework participation and fertility intentions: analysing the gendered division of labour and fertility in Taiwan. In: KAN, M.-Y.; BLAIR, S. L. (Ed.). Chinese families: tradition, modernisation, and change. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2021. p. 141-156.
KOSTER, T.; POORTMAN, A. R.; VAN DER LIPPE, T.; KLEINGELD, P. Fairness perceptions of the division of household labor: housework and childcare. Journal of Family Issues, v. 43, n. 3, p. 679-702, 2021.
LAPPEGÅRD, T.; NEYER, G.; VIGNOLI, D. Three dimensions of the relationship between gender role attitudes and fertility intentions. Genus, v. 77, n. 15, p. 1-26, 2021.
LEE, R. Becker and the demographic transition. Journal of Demographic Economics, v. 81, n. 1, p. 67-74, 2015.
LEOCÁDIO, V.; VERONA, A. P.; WAJNMAN, S. A review of research of the relationship between gender equity and fertility in low-fertility settings. Journal of Population Research, v. 42, n. 1, 2025.
LEOCÁDIO, V.; VERONA, A. P.; WAJNMAN, S. Exploring the association between gender equality in the family and fertility intentions: an explanation of the findings in low-fertility countries. Genus, v. 80, Article 26, 2024.
LEOCÁDIO, V.; VERONA, A. P.; WAJNMAN, S. Intenções de fecundidade: uma revisão da literatura acerca da variável em países de renda alta e no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 40, p. 1-32, 2023.
LIEFBROER, A. C. Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: a life course perspective. European Journal of Population, v. 25, n. 4, p. 363-386, 2009.
LONGO, L. A. F. B. Uniões intra e interraciais, status marital, escolaridade e religião no Brasil: um estudo sobre a seletividade marital feminina, 1980-2000. 2011. 299 f. Tese (Doutorado em Demografia) - Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2011.
MCDONALD, P. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, v. 26, p. 427-439, 2000a.
MCDONALD, P. Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research, v. 17, p. 1-16, 2000b.
MENCARINI, L. Does gender equality affect fertility decisions in Europe? In: GAUTHIER, A. G.; KOTOWSKA, I.; VILHENA, D. (Ed.). Gender (in)equality over the life course: evidence from the Generations & Gender Programme. Population Europe, Generations and Gender Programme (GGP), 2018. (Discussion Paper, n. 10).
MIETTINEN, A.; BASTEN, S.; ROTKIRCH, A. Gender equality and fertility intentions revisited: evidence from Finland. Demographic Research, v. 24, p. 469-496, 2011.
MORGAN, S. P. Is low fertility a Twenty-First-century demographic crisis? Demography, v. 40, n. 4, p. 589-603, 2003.
OSGOOD, D. W. Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, v. 16, p. 21-43, 2000.
PNUD - Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento. Gender Inequality Index. Disponível em: https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/thematic-composite-indices/gender-inequality-index#/indicies/GII Acesso em: 5 fev. 2024.
» https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/thematic-composite-indices/gender-inequality-index#/indicies/GII
PORTACCIO, M. E. A. Efecto de la división del trabajo doméstico no remunerado (TDNR), del trabajo de cuidado no remunerado (TCNR) y de las actitudes de género sobre las preferencias de fecundidad de las mujeres en Colombia. 2019. 209f. Tese (Doutorado em Demografia) - Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional (Cedeplar), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, 2019.
RAYBOULD, A.; SEAR, R. Children of the (gender) revolution: a theoretical and empirical synthesis of how gendered division of labour influences fertility. Population Studies, v. 75, n. 2, p. 169-190, 2021.
RÉGNIER-LOILIER, A. Influence of own sib ship size on the number of children desired at various times of life: the case of France. Population (english edition), v. 61, n. 3, p. 165-194, 2006.
SOBOTKA, T.; BEAUJOUAN, E. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Vienna Institute of Demography, 2014. (Working Papers, 3).
STEFANI, S.; PRATI, G. Gender ideology and fertility: evidence for a curvilinear hypothesis. The Journal of Social Psychology, v. 164, n. 3, p. 280-292, 2024.
SULLIVAN, O.; GERSHUNY, J.; ROBINSON, J. P. Stalled or uneven gender revolution? A long-term processual framework for understanding why change is slow. Journal of Family Theory & Review, v. 10, n. 1, p. 263-279, 2018.
TORR, B. M.; SHORT, S. E. Second births and the second shift: a research note on gender equity and fertility. Population and Development Review, v. 30, n. 1, p. 109-130, 2004.
WESTOFF, C.; HIGGINS, J. Relationships between men’s gender attitudes and fertility: response to Puur et al.’s “Men’s childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century”. Demographic Research, v. 21, n. 3, p. 65-74, 2009.
YOON, S. Y. Is gender inequality a barrier to realizing fertility intentions? Fertility aspirations and realizations in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, v. 12, n. 2, p. 203-219, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Brazilian Journal of Population Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Papers published in Rebep are original and protected under the Creative Commons attribution-type license (CC-BY). This license allows you to reuse publications in whole or in part for any purpose, free of charge, even for commercial purposes. Any person or institution can copy, distribute or reuse the content, as long as the author and the original source are properly mentioned.