Intenções de fecundidade: uma revisão da literatura acerca da variável em países de renda alta e no Brasil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0238Palavras-chave:
Intenções, Fecundidade, Revisão da literaturaResumo
A literatura sobre intenções de fecundidade tem ganhado crescente relevância em estudos demográficos porque, sendo um determinante próximo da fecundidade, auxilia o entendimento do comportamento reprodutivo de diferentes populações. Contudo, esta literatura não foi ainda organizada segundo os principais e mais recorrentes aspectos dispersos na literatura. Estudos geralmente utilizam uma única característica acerca das intenções de fecundidade, seja por meio dos seus conceitos, das principais teorias ou de principais indicadores. Este trabalho possui, portanto, o objetivo de organizar e articular os principais e mais recorrentes aspectos presentes nos estudos sobre intenções de fecundidade. Ao longo da discussão, aprofunda-se na relação existente entre intenções de fecundidade e fecundidade observada. A princípio, foca-se nos países de renda alta, sobre e para os quais a literatura referente ao tema foi desenvolvida. Contudo, também são abordados países de renda média e fecundidade baixa, com ênfase no Brasil, para os quais a produção, especialmente a partir de uma abordagem teórica, ainda é incipiente.
Downloads
Referências
AJZEN, I.; KLOBAS, J. Fertility intentions: an approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Research, v. 29, n. 8, p. 203-232, 2013.
AJZEN, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, v. 50, p. 179-211, 1991.
ALONSO, F. G. The uneven distribution of family responsibilities between women and men, and its link with low fertility: some evidence for European Union countries from Eurobarometer data. Centre d’Estudis Demogràfics, 2004. (Papers de Demografia, n. 253).
ARILHA, M.; BERQUÓ, E. Cairo +15: trajetórias globais e caminhos brasileiros em saúde reprodutiva e direitos reprodutivos. In: ARILHA, M.; BERQUÓ, E. Brasil, 15 anos após a Conferência do Cairo. Campinas, SP: Fundo de População das Nações Unidas, 2009.
BACHRACH, C. A.; MORGAN, S. P. A cognitive-social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review, v. 39, n. 3, p. 459-485, 2013.
BALBO, N.; MILLS, M. The influence of the family network on the realization of fertility intentions. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 179-206, 2011.
BASTEN, S.; SOBOTKA; T.; ZEMAN, K. Future fertility in low fertility countries. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography (VID), Austrian Academy of Sciences, 2013. (Working Paper, n. 5/2013).
BALBO, N.; BILLARI, F. C.; MILLS, M. Fertility in advanced societies: a review of research. European Journal of Population, v. 29, n. 1, p. 1-38, 2012.
BECKER, G. S. An economic analysis of fertility. In: COALE, A. J.; GILLE, H.; JOHNSON, G. C.; KISER, C. V. (Ed.). Demographic and economic change in developed countries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1960. p. 209-240.
BECKER, G. S. A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. Journal of Political Economy, v. 99, p. 1109-1116, 1991.
BECKER, G. S. A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.
BILLARI, F. C.; LIEFBROER, A. C.; PHILIPOV, D. The postponement of childbearing in Europe: driving forces and implications. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 4, n. 1, 2006.
BILLARI, F. C.; PHILIPOV, D.; TESTA, M. R. Attitudes, norms and perceived behavioural control: explaining fertility intentions in Bulgaria. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, v. 25, n. 4, p. 439-465, 2009.
BLOOM, D. E.; CANNING, D.; GÜNTER, I.; LINNEMAYR, S. Social interactions and fertility in developing countries. Harvard School of Public Health, 2008. (Working Paper, n. 34).
BLOSSFELD, H.-P.; KLIJZING, E.; MILLS, M.; KURZ, K. Globalisation, uncertainty, and youth in society. London: Routledge, 2005.
BONGAARTS, J. Do reproductive intentions matter? International Family Planning Perspectives, v. 18, n. 3, p. 102-108, 1992.
BONGAARTS, J. Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, v. 27, p. 260-281, 2001.
BONGAARTS, J. The measurement of wanted fertility. Population and Development Review, v. 16, n. 3, p. 487- 506, 1990.
BRADLEY, S.; CASTERLINE, J. B. Understanding unmet need: history, theory, measurement. Studies in Family Planning, v. 45, n. 2, p. 123-150, 2014.
BRINTON, M.; LEE, D. J. Gender-role ideology, labor market institutions, and post-industrial fertility. Population and Development Review, v. 42, n. 3, p. 405-433, 2016.
BÜHLER, C.; FRATCZAK, E. Learning from others and receiving support: the impact of personal networks on fertility intentions in Poland. European Societies, v. 9, n. 3, p. 359-382, 2007.
CARVALHO, A. A. Demand for contraception in Brazil in 2006: contribution to the implementation of fertility preferences. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 24, n. 10, p. 3879-3888, 2019.
CARVALHO, A. A.; MIRANDA-RIBEIRO, P. As preferências de fecundidade e o planejamento por filhos: discussões a partir de relatos de homens unidos de uma capital e de uma região de fronteira no Brasil. In: SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL FAZENDO GÊNERO, 11 & WOMEN’S WORLDS CONGRESS, 13. Anais [...]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2017.
CARVALHO, A. A.; WONG, L. L. R.; MIRANDA-RIBEIRO, P. Discrepant fertility in Brazil: an analysis of women who have fewer children than desired (1996 and 2006). Revista Latinoamericana de Población, v. 8, p. 83-106, 2016.
CARVALHO, J. A. M.; GARCIA, R. A. O envelhecimento da população brasileira: um enfoque demográfico. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, v. 19, n. 3, p. 725-733, 2003.
CASTERLINE, J. B.; SINDING, S. Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy. Population and Development Review, v. 26, n. 4, p. 691-723, 2000.
CAVENAGHI, S.; ALVES, J. Diversity of childbearing behaviour in the context of below-replacement fertility in Brazil. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2011. (Population Division, Expert Paper, n. 8).
CEPAL - Comissão Econômica para a América Latina e o Caribe. Panorama actual y perspectivas futuras de la fecundidad en América Latina. Panorama social de América Latina 2011. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas, 2012. p. 81-105. Disponível em: http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/1/45171/PSE2011-Panorama-Socialde-America-Latina.pdf Acesso em: ago. 2021.
CHACKIEL, J.; SCHKOLNIK, S. América Latina: los sectores rezagados en la transición de la fecundidad. In: CELADE/CEPAL (Org.). La fecundidad en América Latina: ¿Transición o revolución? Santiago de Chile: Celade/Cepal, 2003. p. 51-74.
CHESNAIS, J. C. Determinants of below replacement fertility. Population Bulletin of the United Nations, v. 40, p. 126-136, 2000.
CHESNAIS, J. C. Fertility, family and social policy. Population and Development Review, v. 22, p. 729-739, 1996.
CIRITEL, A. A.; DE ROSE, A.; AREZZO, M. F. Childbearing intentions in a low fertility context: the case of Romania. Genus, v. 75, n. 4, 2019.
COALE, A. J. The demographic transition reconsidered. In: INTERNATIONAL POPULATION CONFERENCE. Proceedings […]. Liège, Belgium: Eds. Ordina, 1973.
COUTINHO, R.; GOLGHER, A. Modelling the proximate determinants of fertility for Brazil: the advent of competing preferences. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 35, n. 1, 2018.
DAVIDSON, A. R.; JACCARD, J. J. Variables that moderate the attitude-behavior relation: results of a longitudinal survey. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 37, p. 1364-1376, 1979.
ENGELHARDT, H. Fertility intentions and Preferences: effects of structural and financial incentives and constraints in Austria. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, 2004. (Working Paper, 02/2004).
ESHRE CAPRI WORKSHOP GROUP. Europe the continent with the lowest fertility. Human Reproduction Update, v. 16, n. 6, p. 590-602, 2010.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, G.; BILLARI, F. Re-theorizing family demographic change. Population and Development Review, v. 41, n. 1, p. 1-31, 2015.
FIORI, F. Do childcare arrangements make the difference? A multilevel approach to the intention of having a second child in Italy. Population Space and Place, v. 17, n. 5, p. 579-596, 2011.
FIORI, F.; RINESI, F.; PINNELLI, A.; PRATI, S. Economic insecurity and the fertility intentions of Italian women with one child. Population Research and Policy Review, v. 32, n. 3, p. 373-413, 2013.
FOX, J.; KLÜSENER, S.; MYRSKYLÄ, M. Is a positive relationship between fertility and economic development emerging at the sub-national regional level? Theoretical considerations and evidence from Europe. European Journal of Population, v. 35, p. 487-518, 2019.
FREJKA, T.; GOLDSCHEIDER, F.; LAPPEGÅRD, T. The two-part gender revolution, women’s second shift and changing cohort fertility. Comparative Population Studies, v. 43, p. 99-130, 2018.
GALLUP, G.; ROBINSON, C. American Institute of Public Opinion surveys, 1935- 1938. Public Opinion Quarterly, v. 2, n. 3, p. 373-398, 1938.
GAUTHIER, A.; CABAÇO, S.; EMERY, T. Generations and gender survey study profile. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, v. 9, n. 4, p. 456-465, 2018.
GOLDSCHEIDER, F.; BERNHARDT, E.; LAPPEGÅRD, T. The gender revolution: a framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, v. 41 n. 2, p. 207-239, 2015.
GOLDSTEIN, J. R.; LUTZ, W.; TESTA, M. R. The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideals in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review, v. 2, n. 2, p. 479-496, 2003.
GONZÁLEZ, M. A Discrepância entre a fecundidade desejada e a fecundidade concretizada enquanto uma questão de gênero. 2015. 114f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Demografia) - Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas da Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 2015.
GUZMAN, J. M. Fertility transition in Latin America. IPPF Medical Bulletin, v. 23, n. 5, p. 1-3, 1989.
HAGEWEN, K. J.; MORGAN, S. P. Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970-2002. Population and Development Review, v. 31, p. 507-527, 2005.
HAKKERT, R. Fecundidad deseada y no deseada en América Latina, con particular referencia a algunos aspectos de género. In: CELADE/CEPAL (Org.). La fecundidad en América Latina: ¿Transición o revolución? Santiago de Chile: Celade/Cepal, 2003. p. 267-288.
HAMADEH, N.; VAN ROMPAEY, C.; METREAU, E.; EAPEN, S. G. New World Bank country classifications by income level: 2022-2023. World Bank Blogs, 2022. Disponível em: https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-world-bank-country-classifications-income-level-2022-2023#:~:text=Region,-Include%20Values&text=The%20World%20Bank%20assigns%20the,the%20previous%20year%20(2021) Acesso em: dez. 2022.
HARKNETT, K.; HARTNETT, C. The gap between births intended and births achieved in 22 European countries. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography, v. 68, p. 265-282, 2014.
HAYFORD, S.; AGADJANIAN, V. Uncertain future, non-numeric preferences, and the fertility transition: A case study of rural Mozambique. Etude de la Population Africaine, v. 25, n. 2, p. 419-439, 2011.
HAYFORD, S. The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course. Demography, v. 46, n.4, p. 765-783, 2009.
HEILAND, F.; PRSKAWETZ, A.; SANDERSON, W. Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from west German panel data. European Journal of Population, v. 24, n. 2, p. 129-156, 2008.
HENSVIK, L.; NILSSON, P. Business, buddies and babies: social ties and fertility at work. Uppsala: IFAU, 2010. (Working Paper 2010:9).
HERMALIN, A. I.; FREEDMAN, R.; SUN, T.; CHANG, M. Do intentions predict fertility? The experience in Taiwan, 1967-1974. Studies in Family Planning, v.10, p. 75-95, 1979.
HIN, S.; GAUTHIER, A.; GOLDSTEIN, J.; BÜHLER, C. Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 131-156, 2011.
IACOVOU, M.; TAVARES, L. P. Yearning, learning, and conceding: reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 89-123, 2011.
ICF. Demographic and health survey interviewer’s manual. Rockville, Maryland, 2019.
JOHNSON-HANKS, J. A.; BACHRACH, C. A.; MORGAN, S. P.; KOHLER, H-P. Understanding family change and variation: toward a theory of conjunctural action. Dordrecht, The NetherlandsSpringer, 2011.
JUÁREZ, F.; GAYET, C. Fertility transition: Latin America and the Caribbean. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2015. p. 68-72.
JUAREZ, F.; SINGH, S.; MADDOW-ZIMET, I.;WULF, D. Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in Mexico: causes and consequences. New York: Guttmacher Institute, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/Unintended-Pregnancy-Mexico.pdf Acesso em: ago. 2021.
KAPITÀNY, B.; SPÉDER, Z. Realization, postponement or abandonment of childbearing intentions in four European countries. Population, v .67, p. 599-630, 2012.
KLERMAN, L. V. The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition. Maternal and Child Health Journal, v. 4, n. 3, p. 155-162, 2000.
KLOBAS, J. The theory of planned behaviour as a model of reasoning about fertility decisions. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 47-54, 2011.
KODZI, I. A.; JOHNSON, D. R.; CASTERLINE, J. B. To have or not to have another child: life cycle, health and cost considerations of Ghanaian women. Social Science & Medicine, v. 74, n. 7, p. 966-72, 2012.
KUHNT, A. K.; TRAPPE, H. Easier said than done: childbearing intentions and their realization in a short-term perspective. Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2013. (Working Paper, 2013/018).
LEE, J. N.; HWANG, M. J. Determinants on the number of children among married women in Korea. Journal of Population and Social Studies, v. 27, n. 1, p. 53-69, 2019.
LEE, R. Becker and the demographic transition. Journal of Demographic Economics, v. 81, n. 1, p. 67-74, 2015.
LIEFBROER, A. C. Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: a life course perspective. European Journal of Population, v. 25, n. 4, p. 363-386, 2009.
LIEFBROER, A. C. The impact of perceived costs and rewards of childbearing on entry into parenthood: evidence from a panel study. European Journal of Population, v. 21, n.4, p. 367-391, 2005.
LUTZ, W. Adaptation versus mitigation policies on demographic change in Europe. Vienna Yearbook for Population Research, v. 5, p. 19-26, 2007.
LUTZ, W.; SKIRBEKK, V.; TESTA, M. R. The low-fertility trap hypothesis: forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 4, p. 167-192, 2006.
MATSUO, H.; MATTHIJS, K. The impact of well-being on fertility intentions - an analysis based on the European Social Survey (2010). Research & Methods, v. 25, p. 17-46, 2016.
MCDONALD, P. Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, v. 6, n. 3, p. 427-439, 2000.
MENCARINI, L.; VIGNOLI, D.; GOTTARD, A. Fertility intentions and outcomes: implementing the theory of planned behavior with graphical models. Advances in Life Course Research. v. 23, p. 14-28, 2015.
MENCARINI, L.; TANTURRI, M. L. Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women. Genus, v. 60, p. 111-137, 2004.
MILLER, W. B. Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: a theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychological Monographs, v.120, n. 2, p. 223-258, 1994.
MILLER, W. B. Differences between fertility desires and intentions: implications for theory, research and policy. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 9, p. 75-98, 2011.
MILLER, W. B.; PASTA, D. J. Behavioral intentions: which ones predict fertility behavior in married couples? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, v. 25, p. 530-555, 1995.
MILLER, W. B.; SEVERY, L. J.; PASTA, D. J. A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies, v. 58, n. 2, p. 193-205, 2004.
MIRANDA-RIBEIRO, A.; GARCIA, R. Transições da fecundidade no Brasil: uma análise à luz dos diferenciais por escolaridade. In: XVIII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ESTUDOS POPULACIONAIS. Anais [...]. Águas de Lindóia-SP: Abep, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.abep.nepo.unicamp.br/ xviii/anais/files/400.pdf
MORGAN, S. P. Should fertility intentions inform fertility forecasts? In: US CENSUS BUREAU CONFERENCE: THE DIRECTION OF FERTILITY IN THE UNITED STATES. Proceedings […]. Washington, DC: 7 US Census Bureau, 2001. p. 153-178.
MORGAN, S. P.; RACKIN, H. The correspondence between fertility intentions and behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, v. 36, n. 1, p. 91-118, 2010.
MORGAN, S. P.; TAYLOR, M. G. Low fertility at the turn of the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 32, p. 375-99, 2006.
MYRSKYLÄ, M.; KOHLER, H. P.; BILLARI, F. C. Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature, v. 460, p. 741-743, 2009.
NÍ BHROLCHÁIN, M.; BEAUJOUAN, E. How real are reproductive goals? Uncertainty and the construction of fertility preferences. ESRC Centre for Population Change, Dec. 2015. (Working Paper, 73).
OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Family Database, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm Acesso em: jul. 2021.
PERI, A.; PARDO, I. Nueva evidencia sobre la hipótesis de la doble insatisfacción en Uruguay: ¿Cuán lejos estamos de que toda la fecundidad sea deseada? In: WONG, L. R. (Org.). Población y salud sexual y reproductiva en América Latina. Rio de Janeiro: Alap, 2008. p. 55-88 (Serie Investigaciones, n. 4).
PHILIPOV, D.; BERNARDI, L. Reproductive decisions: concepts and measurement in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Comparative Population Studies, v. 36, n. 2-3, p. 495-530, 2011.
PHILIPOV, D. Fertility intentions and outcomes: the role of policies to close the gap. European Journal of Population, v. 25, n. 4, p. 355-361, 2009.
PHILIPOV, D. Fertility in times of discontinuous societal change: the case of Central and Eastern Europe. Rostock: MPIDR - Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, 2002. (Working Paper, 2002-24).
PHILIPOV, D.; THÉVENON, O.; KLOBAS, J.; BERNARDI, L.; LIEFBROER, A. C. Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO): a state of the art review. European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme under the Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities Theme, 2009. (Working Paper).
PHILIPOV, D.; SPÉDER, Z.; BILLARI, F. C. Soon, later, or ever? The impact of anomie and social capital on fertility intentions in Bulgaria (2002) and Hungary (2001). Population Studies, v. 60, n. 3, p. 289-308, 2006.
QUESNEL-VALLEE, A.; MORGAN, P. Missing the target? Correspondence of fertility intentions and behavior in the U.S. Population Research and Policy Review, v. 22, p. 497- 525, 2003.
RAYBOULD, A.; SEAR, R. Children of the (gender) revolution: a theoretical and empirical synthesis of how gendered division of labour influences fertility. Population Studies, v. 75, n. 2, p. 169-190, 2020.
RÉGNIER-LOILIER, A. Influence of own sib ship size on the number of children desired at various times of life: the case of France. Population (english edition), v. 61, n. 3, p. 165-194, 2006.
REGNIER-LOILIER, A.; VIGNOLI, D. Fertility intentions and obstacles to their realization in France and Italy. Population-E, v. 66, n. 2, p. 361-390, 2011.
REHER, D. S. Economic and social implications of the demographic transition. Population and Development Review, v. 37, p. 11-3, 2011.
RINESI, F. Fecondità attesa e realizzata delle madri italiane. 93f. thesis (PhD) - La Sapienza, University of Rome, 2009.
ROSERO-BIXBY, L.; CASTRO-MARTÍN, T.; MARTÍN-GARCÍA, T. Is Latin America starting to retreat from early and universal childbearing? Demographic Research, v. 20, n. 9, p. 169-194, 2009.
ROSSIER, C.; BERNARDI, L. Social interaction effects on fertility: intentions and behaviors. European Journal of Population, v. 25, n. 4, p. 467-485, 2009.
SANTELLI, J.; ROCHAT, R.; HATFIELD-TIMAJCHY, K.; GILBERT, B. C.; CURTIS, K.; CABRAL, R.; HIRSCH, J. S.; SCHIEVE, L. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, v. 35, n. 2, p. 94-101, 2003.
SCHOEN, R.; ASTONE, N.; M.; KIM, Y. J., NATHANSON, C. A. Do fertility intentions affect fertility behaviours? Journal of Marriage and the Family, v. 61, n. 3, p. 790-799, 1999.
SIMÃO, A. B.; COUTINHO, R. Z.; GUEDES, G. R. Desejo por filhos entre mulheres de alta escolaridade: conflitos, mudanças e permanências. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, v. 37, p. 1-23, 2020.
SOBOTKA, T.; BEAUJOUAN, E. Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Vienna Institute of Demography, 2014. (Working Papers, 3).
SOBOTKA, T.; BILLARI, F. C.; KOHLER, H.-P. The return of late childbearing in developed countries: causes, trends and implications. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography, 2010.
SOBOTKA, T. Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO). Synthesis and policy implications. European Demographic Research Papers 1. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, 2011.
SOBOTKA, T. Sub-replacement fertility intentions in Austria. European Journal of Population, v. 25 n. 4, p. 387-412, 2009.
TANSKANEN, A. O.; ROTKIRCH, A. The impact of grandparental investment on mothers’ fertility intentions in four European countries. Demographic Research, v. 31, n. 1, p. 1-26, 2014.
TAZI-PREVE, I. M.; BICHLBAUER, D.; GOUJON, A. Gender trouble and its impact on fertility intentions. Yearbook of Population Research in Finland, v. 40, p. 5-24, 2004.
TESTA, M. R. Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 Survey. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, v. 5, p. 357-379, 2007.
TESTA, M. R. Couple disagreement about short-term fertility desires in Austria: effects on intentions and contraceptive behaviour. Demographic Research, v. 26, n. 3, p. 63-98, 2012a.
TESTA, M. R. Family sizes in Europe: evidence from the 2011 Eurobarometer Survey Contents. Vienna : Vienna Institute of Demography, 2012b. (Working Paper, 2012-2).
TESTA, M. R. On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: individual-and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research, v. 21, p. 28-42, 2014.
TESTA M. R.; GRILLI, L. The influence of childbearing regional contexts on ideal family size in Europe. Population (English edition), v. 61, p. 109-138, 2006.
THÉVENON, O.; LUCI-GREULICH, A. The impact of family policy packages on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population, v. 29, n. 4, p. 387-416, 2013.
THOMSON, E. Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, v. 34, n. 3 p. 343-54, 1997.
UDRY, J. R. Do couples make fertility plans one birth at a time? Demography, v. 20, n. 2, p. 117-128, 1983.
UNDESA - United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. World economic and social survey 2008. Overcoming economic insecurity. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/policy/wess-2008.shtml Acesso em: 2021.
UNFPA - Fundo de População das Nações Unidas. Fecundidade e dinâmica da população brasileira. Brasília: UNFPA, 2018. Disponível em: unfpa.org.br. Acesso em: ago. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Data Portal. Populations Division, 2022. Disponível em: https://population.un.org/dataportal/. Acesso em: ago. 2021.
VAN DE WALLE, E. Fertility transition, conscious choice, and numeracy. Demography, v. 29, n. 4, p. 487-502, 1992.
VAN PEER, C. Desired and achieved fertility. In: KLIJZING, E.; CORIJN, M. (Ed.). Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe: insights and lessons from comparative research. New York and Geneva: United Nations, 2002. v. 2, p. 117-141.
VIGNOLI, J. R. Fecundidad no deseada entre las adolescentes latinoamericanas. Un aumento que desafía la salud sexual y reproductiva y el ejercicio de derechos. Centro Latinoamericano y Caribeño de Demografía (CELADE), División de Población de la Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe, 2017. (Série Populación y Desarrollo).
WESTOFF, C. F.; RYDER, N. B. The predictive validity of reproductive intentions. Demography, v. 14, n. 4, p. 431-53, 1977.
WONG, L. L. R. Evidences of further decline of fertility in Latina America: reproductive behavior and some thoughts on the consequences on the age structure. In: CAVENAGHI, S. M. (Org.). Demographic transformations and inequalities in Latin America: historical trends and recent patterns. Rio de Janeiro: Alap, 2009. (Serie Investigaciones, n. 8).
YU, W.; KUO, J. C. L. Another work-family interface: work characteristics and family intentions in Japan. Demographic Research, v. 36, p. 391-426, 2017.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Os artigos publicados na Rebep são originais e protegidos sob a licença Creative Commons do tipo atribuição (CC-BY). Essa licença permite reutilizar as publicações na íntegra ou parcialmente para qualquer propósito, de forma gratuita, mesmo para fins comerciais. Qualquer pessoa ou instituição pode copiar, distribuir ou reutilizar o conteúdo, desde que o autor e a fonte original sejam propriamente mencionados.
